Philip Henning vs Daniil Sarksian Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Henning has a slightly better second serve performance, winning 45.19% of points compared to Sarksian's 42.65%. Could this give Henning a slight edge when it matters?
• When it comes to returning second serves, Sarksian is ahead, winning 47.41% of points, while Henning trails with 43.24%.
• On first serve returns, Sarksian also leads with 31.13% against Henning's 25.64%.
• Under pressure, Henning excels by saving 56.54% of breakpoints, compared to Sarksian’s 46.43%.
• Henning has shown superior overall performance over the last year, winning 68.66% of matches, whereas Sarksian has only won 41.18%.
• Henning’s best surface is Hard with an 80% win rate, while Sarksian struggles on Hard with a 41% win rate.
• Both players compete mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments. Henning, however, wins 87.18% of these matches, against Sarksian’s 41.18%.
• In direct head-to-head, Henning has been victorious in their single encounter, winning both sets decisively.
• Henning has faced opponents with a tougher average ranking, 345 versus Sarksian’s 512.79.
• Henning and Sarksian have not faced a tiebreak or deciding set in their previous meeting, indicating past conclusive wins.
• In overall set deciders against all players, Sarksian has a slight advantage, winning 57% compared to Henning’s 50%.
• For breakpoint opportunities, Sarksian has a higher conversion rate at 36.36%, surpassing Henning’s 30.13%.

Editorial Prediction (July 18, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance trends and statistics reveals several areas where each player has strengths. Henning has demonstrated a modest edge in both second serve execution and under-pressure resilience, suggesting reliability in critical moments.

Sarksian, however, shines when returning serves, showing an ability to challenge Henning's serve effectively. Although Sarksian converts breakpoints at a higher rate, Henning's overall win percentage, particularly on hardcourts, is compelling.

Taking into account their head-to-head history, Henning appears to harness significant influence across various match metrics. Considering these factors, Henning is more likely to triumph in their upcoming encounter.